Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.Īhead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Blue Owl Capital Inc. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.Įmpirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? Shares have added about 0.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 6.5%. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.īlue Owl Capital Inc. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates three times over the last four quarters. This compares to year-ago revenues of $275.98 million. , which belongs to the Zacks Financial - Investment Management industry, posted revenues of $390.99 million for the quarter ended March 2023, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.92%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times.īlue Owl Capital Inc. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.15 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.15, delivering no surprise. This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -6.25%. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items. This compares to earnings of $0.11 per share a year ago. ( OWL Quick Quote OWL - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.15 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.16 per share. Changes in project strategies will be needed to address racial/ethnic disparities for chlamydial infection among young female FP clinic clients.Blue Owl Capital Inc. Racial/ethnic differences in chlamydia persisted over time and were not mitigated by adjustment for aggregate socioeconomic position or areal racial/ethnic measures. Chlamydia positivity over time did not change for racial/ethnic minority groups after adjusting for individual-and population-level factors. Among white women, there was a significant 4% relative annual increase in predicted chlamydia during the 10-year period 1997-2006. The impact of population-level ABSMs on chlamydia varied across racial/ethnic groups and was generally modest. Compared with white women, infection risk was significantly higher for black (adjusted odds ratio = 1.93), American Indian/Alaska Native (AOR= 1.62), Asian/Pacific Islander (AOR= 1.42), and Hispanic (AOR= 1.28) women. Relatively steep chlamydia gradients were found across racial/ethnic ABSM levels. Significant racial/ethnic differences in chlamydia persisted after adjusting for individual and aggregate factors. Using data from 667,223 chlamydia tests obtained from women aged 15-24 years screened in 201 FP clinics, we employed a generalized mixed model with logistic link, incorporating clinic and ZIP code as random effects to adjust for risk of chlamydia associated with individual-and population-level (areal) measures for the overall population and for each racial/ethnic subpopulation. We then explored these measures within racial/ethnic subpopulations. Public Health Service (PHS) Region X Infertility Prevention Project (IPP) family planning (FP) clinics from 1997-2006. We assessed chlamydia trends, individual-level risk factors, and population-level area-based socioeconomic measures (ABSMs) associated with chlamydia infection in women attending U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |